Archive for the ‘Missions’ Category

Experience vs. Scripture

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

  Scripture, hands down!

  As an illustration, consider that most of the Bible’s explicit teaching on marriage, at least in the New Testament, comes from single men: Jesus and Paul. OK, Jesus is the perfectly wise, all-knowing Logos of God through whom everything was created, so of course He has full authority on every subject. So consider Paul with me for a moment.

  There is general consensus from passages such as 1 Cor 9 that the apostle Paul never married. This is the same Paul who wrote such passages as the cornerstone of a Biblical perspective on marriage: Ephesians 5:22-33. If perhaps Paul was married earlier in life, lost his wife to death, and was a widower during his Christian and apostolic years, I’ll still stand by my point. Paul’s teaching on marriage is an illustration of my point, not the proof of it.

  Regardless of personal experience, Paul knew his Lord intimately, he knew the Jewish Scriptures, and he knew the fulfillment of those Scriptures in Christ. Boom, that’s a recipe for being an expert on marriage in my book. Say on the other hand we have a couple that have been married for 80 years, have stayed together, and would even claim a mostly “happy marriage”, but they don’t have a clue what their marriage has to do with Christ. Well, there may be a thing or two worth hearing and considering from their experience, but I’d rather listen to the single guy who knows his Bible deeply any day.

  Experiencial wisdom is valuable if our experiences have forced us to dig harder and deeper into God’s word for answers and direction and understanding on issues we are confronting. But years of experience gained through a pagan, secular, humanistic, godless lens either needs to be redeemed by filtering all of it back through the grid of Scripture, or else thrown out in the rubbish bin.

  The area of application which has prompted me to write this post is that of evangelism and discipleship strategies targeting specific sub-cultures. In particular, I’ve been compiling some articles for missionaries to Muslims lately, and certain ideas and issues repeatedly come up. Now, let me first say that any talk about “targeting” certain groups, about “strategy“, and about “effectiveness” makes me feel edgy at the outset. That aside, the question relevant to us now is: should ministry approaches be guided by insider believers within the “target” sub-culture or by outsiders who have crossed cultural boundaries to reach out to them?

  Well, first I would want to stake a claim that insiders and outsiders both have unique advantages when it comes to understanding a cultural group and their needs. Insiders of course have years of experience, understanding on a deep level many nuances of their culture that outsiders will never fully appreciate. However, what is less often noted is that outsiders bring some crucial advantages of their own. In particular, they see the new culture with fresh eyes and probably in many ways without certain biases that insiders have. Just as each one of us individually finds it easier to see others’ sins while downplaying our own, cultural insiders often have blind spots to their own group’s weakness and faults (or conversely can even be overly critical and not aware of their own strengths).

  On that note, let me mention that I promote much more intercultural accountability in the church. We need not just white evangelical American men holding white evangelical American men accountable to God’s word, and not just mainland Han Chinese holding mainland Han Chinese accountable, etc., etc., but we need Christ’s church in Korea to keep the American church in check, the Americans to keep the Nepalese in check, the Nepalese believers to keep the Syrian church in check, and the church of Syria to hold the Ugandan saints accountable, and the church of Uganda to expose the oversights of the Koreans.

  For example, by and large I’ve seen that most American Christians don’t feel a sense of utter shock and horror to hear about a congregation spending millions of dollars to add an extension on to their already overly spacious under-used building structure, but bring in a visiting pastor from a poor African country where there is one Bible per congregation and people struggle to have enough to eat and the abomination of it all is unmistakable. Or again, by and large I’ve found that ethnic Chinese Singaporean and Malaysian Christians don’t find it utterly unthinkable to hear that a church would actually prohibit distribution of Bibles in the Malay language for fear of being known as a church that is trying to reach Muslims, whereas any outsider can clearly see the appalling hypocrisy.

  So then, if insiders and outsiders both have advantages, who is ultimately more qualified to judge what a people group or sub-culture needs and what is best for them? I would argue that, on any particular given issue, it is the one — insider or out — who has the most Biblically-saturated perspective on that particular issue. The crucial qualifiers here are that it can vary on a case-by-case basis for different issues. An insider can have profound Biblical insight into his own culture in one area and glaring worldly blindspots in another area. An outsider can have penetrating Biblical exhortations for a foreign culture in one area, and shallow, naive, humanistic wisdom in other areas.

  Who’s to decide which is what? In the end we must each make a choice as to what we believe to be right and act on it, and let others do the same. Each one to his own master must stand or fall (Rom 14:4). In the process, at least as for me I will continue to judge the validity of ideas not on the experiences of the one promoting them, but ruthlessly and solely based on fidelity to Scripture. When I’m 80 years old and have been married for 50 of those years (God willing) and a single 20-year old young man comes to me and says, “I’ve got something I think you need to see about marriage from the Bible,” O Lord that I would listen to him carefully. When an Asian believer comes to me and says, “Can I talk to you from the perspective of God’s word about some blindspots in the culture you spent your entire life growing up in?”, I hope that I would genuinely say, “Please do!” And I pray my brothers and sisters would do the same.

OT “Missions” Verses

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

  Much of the greatest inspiration I find for trusting God for great things in ministry and missions is actually in the Old Testament. Our battle as Christians is a spiritual one, not against flesh and blood (Ephesians 6), which is why, for example, the Crusades were a terrible and sinful mistake. But God demonstrated the spiritual realities to come in Christ through tangible physical entities in Israel, and so I believe that God’s work through the Hebrew army has much to teach Christ’s servants who seek to wage bold peace in advancing His kingdom today. Here are three categories of Old Testament “missions” verses that inspire me the most.


  God is not pleased when Israel relies on horses and chariots for military victory. Translation for us today: God is not pleased when we rely on wordly tools such as strategies, techniques, methologies, and psychological tactics, rather than resting on His power, His Spirit, and His “foolish” ways (see 1 Cor 1).

Deut 17:16, 20:1
2 Chr 14:9 & 16:8
Ps 20:7, 33:16-19, 147:9-10
Pr 21:31
Isa 2:7-8, 22:5-14 (esp. 11), 31:1


  Who will inherit/possess the land? And who will not? It is not the strong and the powerful, but the faithful and those sovereignly chosen according to God’s own purposes. My notes on the following versus summarize whom God says will inherit or possessing the land.

Gen 15:6-7 Abraham (because of God’s choice and by Abraham’s faith)
Gen 28:4 Jacob (blessed by God)
Ex 32:13 Descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob by God’s promise
Lev 20:22-27 (esp. 24) The holy (unholy will be spit out)
Num 14:22-24 Caleb who followed God fully (Promised here in Numbers, fulfilled in Josh 14:9)
Deut 4:1 The obedient (Also Deut 8:1, 11:8, Joshua 23:5-6, 1 Chr 28:8)
Deut 4:25-26 Idolators will NOT remain in the land
Deut 4:37-39 Those chosen & beloved, from a weaker and smaller nation
Deut 5:32-34 Those who walk in the way the Lord has commanded
Deut 6:18 Those who do what is right and good in the sight of the Lord
Deut 9:4-5 Wicked will NOT; God does it for His purpose despite us!
Deut 16:20 The just
[Josh 11:23 Joshua (Not Moses and former generation who disobeyed)]
Ps 25:12-13 The man who fears the Lord
Ps 37:9 Those who wait for the Lord
Ps 37:11 The humble
Ps 37:22 Those blessed by God
Ps 37:29 The righteous (Also Isa 60:21)
Ps 37:34 Those who wait for the Lord and keep His way
Ps 44:1-7 (esp. 3) Not by sword or strength but by God’s arm
Isa 57:13 He who takes refuge in the Lord
Ezek 33:25-26 Not the immoral, nor those who RELY on the sword


  The Lord is not constrained to save by many or by few. Jesus and His twelve apostles “turned the world upside down”. Paul established churches across more territory than dozens of mission teams would ever dream of covering today. It is not about recruiting masses and conquering by numbers. It is about God glorifying Himself by using small and the weak instruments that obey Him fully to accomplish His great purposes.

Exodus 23:20-33
Leviticus 26:7-8
Numbers 13:25-14:45
Deuteronomy 28:7
Joshua 6
Judges 7:2
1 Samuel 14:6
1 Samuel 17:45-47
2 Chronicles 20:14-25

Activism FAQ

Friday, October 31st, 2008

  For the last few weeks, on and off, I have hung a banner from my car in the parking lot of my workplace with this image (click for better resolution):


Baby killed at 8 weeks
together with a magnetic car door sign which simply reads, “Men are the Problem, menaretheproblem.info.” To make a long story short, some people complained, the property management got upset and threatened my company that they were in violation of their tenancy agreement unless they made me stop. On Monday October 27, 2008, I was fired.

  Now, it seems that whenever I do something that is considered slightly controversial amongst Christians, like hang a banner displaying the plain reality of abortion from my car or pass our Bibles to Muslims (don’t ask me to explain how the question of whether or not to pass out Bibles can be a controversy in the church !!!???!!!, or how it can even be a question at all !!!???!!!) that there are certain recurring questions and remarks to be addressed. So here is my first edition of an activism FAQ. There is a particular focus on this recent incident with the banner at work, but many of the principles also have wider applicability. Many of these are questions or remarks I’ve heard first hand, some I have heard second hand, and some are questions that I’ve asked myself.1) “Hmm, well Zach. I do appreciate the fact that your heart is open to do something about this issue [whatever it is], but are you sure this is the best way?”  Nope! I’m not sure it is the best way. But I’m pretty sure that it is a good way! Or at the very least an acceptable way! There is a saying out there that, “The good is the greatest enemy of the best,” that is, we never reach the best because we settle for the good. But I’ve found that mixing that adage up is much more relevant to my life, and perhaps yours. My modified saying is, “The best is the greatest enemy of the good.” That is, as long as I keep searching for the best way to do something, I never find it, because every path has its list of disadvantages. Pursuing the best, I end up doing nothing. Better to do the good thing, than to do nothing while on the endless quest to find the best! See also this post.2) “Um, wow. That’s an, um, interesting thing that you did. I’m not sure how to respond.”

  Here is what I think is some Biblical advice for the person in such a situation. You’ve got two choices. If you’ve gathered enough information to adequately understand the situation, and you think that what I’ve done is sinful, then by all means you must rebuke me (Matthew 18:15ff). If not, if what I’ve done appears to be within acceptable parameters for a disciple of Christ, then I think that Biblically you are called to encourage me (1 Thes 5:11) as we continue to spur one another on towards love and good deeds (Hebrews 10:24). Certainly, such encouragement can take the form of constructive suggestion, “Hey, did you think about trying this… ?” But of all of the “one another” statements in the New Testament, I don’t see any that say, “Heap discouragement on one another.” Either rebuke the sin, or encourage the fainthearted (1 Thes 5:14). And yes, I do get fainthearted; I probably loathe conflict more than most people, and yet the Lord keeps putting in me a compelling drive to step out in ways that inevitably bring conflict. It’s hard.  And this isn’t just about me. Let’s all try to stop discouraging each other. One person loves to share Christ in the context of relationships and another loves going door to door. Praise the Lord for both of them, don’t attack each other! One person wants more prayer meetings and another one wants more Bible study. They are both right! Any desire within the church to turn off the tube and devote oneself to holy endeavors of eternal value should be cultivated rather than squelched. To anyone I have discouraged in their simple quest to love and please the Lord, I’m sorry; I’m seeking to turn away from that and be an encourager of all things good.

3) “What’s all this focus on abortion? Have you abandoned your passion for missions?”

  I still think the greatest need, and what I would like to do more than anything, is the public preaching of the gospel in so-called closed countries. Please pray that God would fill me with His Spirit to empower me for that ministry. I tried standing up on street corners and speaking out a few times in China. Words of conviction and power just don’t seem to come to my lips when I try public speaking. I must say that I just don’t feel the Holy Spirit is in it. Now, when I give a talk on an issue that I’ve written five papers about and spent ten years thinking about, I can by God’s grace give a good empassioned talk. I hope and pray that through writing the Lord will solidify things in my heart and mind which I can then speak about more effectively.

  But I digress. Abortion? Ya, it is quite important too. In fact, I can’t begin to tell you the numerous ways I see the issues as utterly interrelated. Well yes, I can at least begin to do it. See this post and this one. Consider also the non-compartmentalization of God. It seems to me in the Old Testament that if a Hebrew cheated with unbalanced weights and measures in the marketplace (see Deut 25:13-16), then as an “abomination” in the eyes of the Lord, he would have no reason to expect victory out on the battlefield (compare Joshua 7). If I harden my heart to a wicked and unjust atrocity of such magnificent proportions in my own country (and elsewhere) as abortion, how can I go make disciples of all nations, teaching them to obey all that Jesus has commanded us? Again, the Great Commission isn’t to rake in millions of prayer cards signed by professed converts who don’t really even know Him, it is to make disciples.

4) “Have you thought about your family and especially your kids?”

  Ya, I’ve thought a lot about my family. I’ve thought about my family through the perspective of the German kids who were raised by parents who didn’t really support the Holocaust, but who thought that standing up against the actions of the Nazi regime would be too costly. I’ve thought about my family through the perspective of those kids, now grown, whom I’ve heard say, “I can’t believe my parents stood by and let that happen.”

  As a father I have a responsibility to protect my kids. And some dangers are greater than others. I might let my son fall out of his chair and get a small bump if he insists on ignoring my instruction to sit down on his bum. But I won’t let him “learn the hard way” with a chainsaw. The greatest danger facing all of humanity is eternal hellfire for rejecting God and the salvation offered through His Son Jesus Christ. Unrepentant cowardice is one way that we demonstrate that we have never come to know Jesus or had our name written in His book of life (Rev 21:8), because those who do come to Him receive a Spirit not of timidity but of power (2 Tim 1:7). My greatest responsibility then, to the two little boys who imitate just about anything I do and say is to model for them godliness and faith, rather than fear of man and unbelief.

  When my friend Rick and I were facing the threat of a 2-5 year jail sentence for proselytization in Malaysia, our main interrogator Sergeant Ibrahim repeatedly said to Rick things like, “You are a bad father. You did this and got yourself in trouble while you have a little daughter at home.” In speaking this way, Sergeant Ibrahim was the very mouthpiece of Satan for discouragement to Rick. Little Esther (and now Sarah as well) are very blessed to have a father who loves Jesus as much as Rick does. The best love and care and protection he can give them is to show them how to live for Jesus. Second to my own dad who loves me dearly and was instrumental in leading me to Christ following his own conversion, second to him Rick is (at least tied for) the father I respect the most.

5) “But what about providing stability for your wife?”

  Let me tell you about a woman I know, let’s call her Lisa. Lisa is a preacher’s wife. Lisa’s husband has preached solid Biblical truth from the pulpit for many years. He has emphasized that our thinking must be shaped by the Bible. He has repeatedly said he wants his church to “not merely be a church with Bibles, but rather a Biblical church.” Then one day someone comes along and says, “Hey, here are 1000 free copies of the gospel of Luke in the language of the local Muslim people of this area. Let’s distribute them to people in this church to give to their Muslim friends.”

  Seems like a no-brainer, right? But for a church in this area to be known as actively evangelizing Muslims would bring some consequences. People could lose jobs, the government could take away the expensive church property, and Lisa and her husband who are actually citizens of a different country could be deported. In the end, Lisa’s husband goes along with the decision of his elder board not only to refrain from distributing these Bibles but actually to prohibit the distribution of Bibles in the Muslim language on church grounds. Lisa’s husband has flipped from wanting to shepherd a congregation that seeks “not merely be a church with Bibles, but rather a Biblical church,” into leading a church that outlaws Bibles because the consequences of having them around are deemed too costly. Lisa and her husband get to keep their house and keep their jobs, simply by throwing away everything that her husband has claimed to stand for for decades.

  I feel sad for Lisa. I don’t want to do that to my wife. I want to provide her the stability of knowing that through loss of job, loss of freedom, loss of house, loss of money, loss of property, and loss of life, not only will I never leave her nor forsake her, but I will also always strive to uncompromisingly keep our family on the one solid and stable rock that can endure any tsunami (Matthew 7:24-27).

6) “What crazy thing are you going to do next?”

  I’ve found that the Lord doesn’t open my eyes to step 2 until I’ve taken step 1. So I try to be faithful in the little things, and hope that He will entrust me with greater things. See also the answer to question 1 above. Whatever it is, may it not be “crazy” except in the sense of being “crazy for Jesus, His kingdom, and His righteousness.”

7) “If you end up in jail in some country for doing whatever it is, how do you want people to pray for you?”

  Pray through Philippians 1.

8) “How would you encourage others to act in light of the overwhelming atrocity of ongoing slaughter in this country?”

  If you have an idea of your own, that fits the way God has made you and is within Biblical parameters, then by all means I want to encourage you to do that which is on your heart.

  Ultimately I think the only hope and only answer to the abortion problem is prayer (Luke 18:1-8). But note, the cited parable doesn’t speak of the Lord being moved by a half-hearted word of prayer. Rather it says that He will not delay to bring about justice to His elect who cry out to Him day and night. I believe that a movement of empassioned prayer will only happen in tandem with a movement of empassioned living. If the Spirit prompts us with ideas of, “Hey I could hang a banner from my car,” or whatever, and if we quench Him, then we will be quenching the Spirit of prayer. See again this post.

  If you really feel you “should do something” about this issue, and really don’t know what, I’d be glad to talk you through it. I do have some ideas myself, but even better if in talking I could help draw out some ideas that suit how God has made you.

9) “What drives your concern about abortion? Are you concerned more about the babies, or the mothers, or your own reputation, or what?”

  There is concern for the babies. If you haven’t already, definitely watch The Silent Scream in which an ultrasound recorded the actual images inside the womb as an abortion was happening. This movie is in some ways even more moving than the graphic movies of baby hands and feet being removed from the uterus after he has already been dismembered, because in the Silent Scream you actually see the terrified baby in the supposed safe, warm haven of his mother’s womb, sensing that he is in trouble as the baby vacuum starts poking around. You can almost hear him screaming, “Help me, help me, I’m in trouble, momma, dadda, can you help me? I’m scared!” But of course momma and dadda don’t come to help because they are the ones who paid to have him torn to pieces. So even though the baby is in some ways blessed to be spared from having to live a long life in this evil fallen world (Isa 57:1-2), you still have to have compassion for such a defenseless one to face such a traumatic experience.

  There is pastoral concern for the mothers, too. Hopefully they will find repentance, restoration, forgiveness, and spiritual and even physical healing. Even still, the saddness of such a terrible choice will be hard to break free from in this life.

  And I have a particular concern for the party that is all too neglected in discussions about abortion — the fathers. It is one of the most pathetic and disgusting things imaginable to see true manhood disappearing in a landscape of immature boys who care more about “getting laid” (and football) than things like honor, valor, and responsibility. Seeing selfish boys of any age turn in to real men is always a refreshing and inspiring experience.

  But more so than any of these I’d say my concern is for Christians. If I hang such a banner from my car, I’m more hoping to move the hearts of pro-lifers than pro-choicers. What? Yep. Really, what I want more than anything else is to remove any barriers to a passionate relationship between Christ and His church. And the ongoing hardening of our hearts is just such a major barrier. See again this post.

10) “Why did you sign the end of your prayer letter with `Zach, on behalf of my wonderfully supportive wife, and our two martyr-for-Jesus-in-training sons’?”

  Well, I’m Zach, my wife really has been wonderfully supportive during this and the one or two other “controversial” deeds of activism I have engaged in since we’ve been married, and oh, the bit about our sons being in training for martyrdom for Jesus? I can’t say I have a well formulated curriculum at this point, but basically that is just another way of saying I want them to be Christians. Because I’m sure you realize that Bonhoeffer was Biblically spot on when he said, “When Christ calls a man, he calls him to come and die.” Martyrs-for-Jesus-in-training are the only kind of Christians I see in the Bible.

11) “Perhaps you are being rebellious against authority [the government, or the employer as the case may be].”

  That certainly is a valid issue. The extent to which God expects us to submit to human authority structures even when those people are sinful, wicked, unbelieving, Christian persecuting pagans, is astounding. David knew that Saul had departed from the way of the Lord, but refused to lift a finger to harm the king whom he called “the Lord’s Anointed.” David even killed the messenger who came to tell him of Saul’s demise. All this despite the fact that Saul had spent years on a rabid mission to destroy David (1 and 2 Samuel). Slaves are taught to obey masters who mercilessly beat them (1 Peter 2), and wives are taught to submit to unbelieving husbands “in the same way” (1 Peter 3). Christians of all stripes are commanded to submit to the very governments that persecute them (1 Peter 1, Romans 13). Remarkable.

  Ultimately the reason, I believe, is that human authority is a shadow of the One True Authority over all heaven and earth. Just as Saul, having been anointed as king, was a shadow of the Anointed One (i.e. the Messiah = Christ). As much as a king, or a husband, or a master, or a parent might fail to live a life of godliness, they still hold the “office” which is a shadow of the true King, Husband, Master, and Father of all.

  But at the same time, we are clearly taught to obey God rather than men (Acts 4) and to fear God rather than men (Matthew 10:17-28). We are also called to have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather to expose them (Eph 5:11). When Esther dared to approach King Xerxes she said, “If [I and my people] had merely been sold as male and female slaves, I would have kept quiet, because no such distress would justify disturbing the king [emphasis added]” (Esther 7:4b). Causing annoyance to the king, or the president, or the master, or the boss, or the husband, or the parent, or the church elder whose authority you are under is no small thing at all. And yet, when people are in fact being given over to slaughter, destruction, and annihilation (Esther 7:4a) it is not only commensurate but in fact incumbent upon the people of God to somehow intervene (Prov 24:11-12).

  When it comes to these sorts of things, there is nothing that I struggle with more than seeking to know how to respect and be submissive towards authority while at the same time realizing that to completely satisfy the authority would require exalting their wishes and desires about God’s priorities. I agonize for days and weeks and months over such things. I would be delighted to receive a clear and unmistakable prophetic word from the Lord saying, “Do this, don’t do that.” But until that comes, I’m accountable to make the best decisions I can in light of His revealed word with dependence on His Spirit through prayer.

  Do I come out with exactly the right balance on these issues? Probably not. Before this most recent banner at work experience there was something else I had tried, and after a conversation with my boss one time I had to go back to him and apologize for not speaking respectfully. He said he didn’t think I was disrespectful but I knew that by the standard I’d seen in Scripture I was. Of course, I later went on to do some things he didn’t like. But I sought harder to be respectful in the process. So I make mistakes, repent, persevere, keep learning, and move ahead.

  So yes, perhaps I have been rebellious against authority in this or that situation, and to the extent that it is so may the Lord bring correction. But before jumping to such conclusions or lightly throwing around such accusations, please realize that there are agonizingly difficult issues in the balance here.

12) “Why do this at the workplace? It’s not like you work for a company that makes baby vacuums or anything like that. If you are going to protest, why not do it outside of Planned Parenthood?”

  First of all, it is not either/or. Protesting outside of an abortion clinic is certainly commendable and I have done so in the past.

  But I was specifically compelled to take action at the workplace primarily because, after my home, that is where I was spending the most of my time each week. I believe that with proximity (be it geographical, relational, etc.) comes responsibility. Let’s talk about evangelism for a minute. It is good and commendable if you wish to share a brief word about Christ to the cashier at the checkout counter or the person riding in the elevator with you. I almost never do that, unless they happen to say something that gives me opportunity to simply speak my thoughts about the Lord. But as for somebody you spend gobs of time with, isn’t it all the more reasonable that they should know what you believe? [And yes I have spoken about Christ with people in the workplace, especially how He is foreshadowed in the Old Testament (a subject I’m particulary interested in), more than I have spoken with workmates about abortion.] So the more time you spend with people, the more it tears you up inside if you haven’t talked with them about the matters you know to be most important.

  Also, bringing the issue of abortion into the “average everyday workplace” is precisely my intended target. One of the big reasons atrocities such as the slaughter of American lives on the order of a 9/11 tragedy every single are allowed to continue, is because we who know the truth allow society to define the categories and parameters in which the “issue” is addressed. We allow society to stick it with the label “political and/or religious issue” and then we go along with the reasoning that the workplace is not the appropriate context for dialogue on religious and political issue. Ladies and gentlemen, this is more than a religious or political issue. Although I certainly support Colorado’s “Personhood Amendment” 48, I find it offensive that alongside being asked whether I want to reduce tax subsidies to energy companies, I am also asked to register my “personal opinion” on whether a small defenseless person should be acknowledged as a person or whether we should be allowed to chop him up into pieces and suck the pieces out with a vacuum. This is more than a “ballot issue.”

  When there is a national tragedy, even “business workplaces” show enough respect to lower the flag to half mast. Flags should be lowered for respect, rememberance, and shame over the fallen every single day in this country, and short of that happening, I believe that making my own show (in the workplace parking lot) of respect for the dead is entirely appropriate, and if anything it is probably far too little.

13) “OK, but if you want to speak out in the workplace, why a banner on your car?”

  Why not?

  Actually, I did try a few other things before I had the banner idea. I did talk about the issue with the coworkers I knew best [of course, not charging such time to my record of working hours]. The boss said that if the issue came up, it was OK to discuss, but if I tried going from person to person or office to office with such an agenda that I would be canned. I passed out fliers in front of the workplace for about 10 minutes before property management came down on me. I talked with the boss about having an informal, off hours, voluntary forum in which to invite fellow coworkers, and he was actually OK with the idea, but the rest of the management team nixed the idea. The lines kept getting pushed back further and further. Eventually I came up with the idea of a banner on my car, figuring that what I did with my own car in the parking lot outside of the workplace was my own business. And again, to his credit, the boss was personally agreeable, but property management wasn’t.

  I could have stuck with a bumper sticker on my car, and probably wouldn’t have had any trouble. It also would have had virtually no impact. Unfortunately, on such matters, there seems to be a high correlation between people not getting upset and people not paying the least bit of attention to what you are doing.

14) “Are you going to sue your company for violating your rights to free speech?”

  No. Certainly there is a place for “claiming one’s Roman citizenship” not merely for the sake of defending one’s self from receiving a flogging but also: 1) to bring attention (light) to a matter that the forces of the world would want to sweep under the rug and hide and forget about, and 2) to set a precedent. I can see the legitimacy of at least considering the possibility that the case with my current employer is such a case that should fought in court with a godly demeanor. However, my conclusion is that this is not such a case. My main two reasons are:
  i) My bosses are Christian. Along the lines of 1 Cor 6, I think it would bring shame on the name of Christ to bring this issue before the pagan courts and news media. I can hear them now, “Look, the Christians can’t even agree amongst themselves about this issue, so why should we listen to anything they say?”
  ii) Even if I did have a right under American law to not be discriminated against in this way, it is not a right I want to claim or press for. Personally, I believe my employer should be able to fire me if they don’t like the effect my views have on the workplace environment. Morally, I think my employer is wrong. But I don’t think that “doing the right thing” is something that should be legislated in this type of case.

  If the boss wanted to stand up to property management in court and say, “Hey, you can’t threaten us that we are in violation of tenancy agreement for refusing to fire Zach over this,” then I think I would support the company in doing so. But they don’t want to. They would rather get rid of me and the legal counseling fees I was costing them. So if that is the way the company wants to go, I don’t want to fight from that angle in court.

15) “Are you seeking to get persecuted?”

  Are you crazy? No way! If you think I enjoy conflict then you definitely don’t know me. Or is it that you think that I love to get praised by fellow Christians for being zealous? Well yes, I do, and I repent of that. But I need to make you aware of a very sad reality that my experience has been whenever you seek to serve the Lord in a way that may bring about some suffering that could have been avoided had you compromised and watered down your stance, then in choosing the path of righteousness that involves a bit of suffering you will face more discouragement from professed Christians than encouragement. Other professed Christians get afraid that you are going to “make trouble” for them too. Perhaps that is why some portions of this post may come across as defensive or even bitter. I’m sorry for that. I don’t want to give any room to bitterness.

  I don’t seek persecution. But I don’t make the avoidance of it a high priority either. Here is the key: neither seeking persecution nor seeking to avoid persecution should be our decision criteria. The decision criteria is, “How can I please the Lord? What decision is in line with godliness and holiness as revealed in Scripture?”

  You can tell what a listener values by what they focus in on. Supposedly (I haven’t found verification of this story) one time Tony Campolo, speaking to a church audience, said, “Four million (or some such number) people died from starvation last year and nobody gives a shit about it. And the proof of that is that you are more worked up that the guy in the pulpit just said a naughty word than you are about the four million dead from starvation.”

  Suppose I say, “Tom preached the gospel to 100 Muslims and they beat him and threw him in jail (or killed him or whatever).” One person will say, “What? Tom did something that got himself beaten!? How foolish!” Another will say, “Wow, 100 Muslims got to hear the gospel at once! Praise the Lord!” Be careful how you listen, because in doing so you reveal what you consider to be of great account and what you consider to be of small account.

  To those who say that I’m seeking persecution, I say you are missing the point. You are focusing in on the wrong part of the story.

16) “You are not even being `persecuted’, you are just facing the consequences of a bad decision. Christians should be willing to suffer for Jesus, but not for doing something stupid.”

  I don’t think that I ever said I was being persecuted. The word comes up when we discuss such issues, but I don’t think I would choose to use it to describe this situation. I would say though that I believe this incident falls under the category of suffering for righteousness sake. If you think that displaying my banner [or say, passing out Bibles to Muslims] is “stupid”, well I guess you are entitled to your opinion. But I think it is a pretty sad opinion to have. Could you explain to me why you would call such things “stupid”?

  The Biblical call to be ready to suffer in this world alongside Jesus is more than merely passive. Yes, if someone of their own initiative comes to you and points a gun to your head and tells you to renounce Christ then you should stand firm in the faith. But love demands more than that. Let’s say that you were a white Southerner a few decades ago when hate-filled white folk were lynching blacks in America. Let’s further say that no one comes around demanding to know where you stand on the “lynching debate” with threats to harm you if they discover you are a “nigger-lover.” The only way you will suffer is if you take the initiative upon yourself to step out and do something. At the same time, the only way you can LOVE the black community is if you take the initiative upon yourself to step out and do something.

  Note that we didn’t go up to heaven to bring Jesus down and crucify Him. He came. We didn’t even want Him to come, but He came. LOVE often demands that we put ourself in the line of fire to rescue others. The fact that such a concept would be so foreign to contemporary evangelical Christianity is a testimony to how far we have wandered from the core of the true Biblical gospel itself.

Missions, Abortion, Starvation, … and Revival

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

  If you walk into the front room of our house, you will see a poster that I made on a piece of cardboard. Most of the poster consists of a full page newspaper add for Sofa Mart that I saved from 1998. It says, “What Are You Passionate About? For Italian’s (sic) It’s Soccer And Fine Leather Sofas!” Pictured is an older man with a soccer ball and a boy with an Italian flag both sitting on a fine leather sofa with several people standing around the sofa waving Italian flags. That ad has made me sad whenever I’ve looked at it over the last ten years.

  On the poster I have written an answer to Sofa Mart’s question: “For our family it is JESUS!” Then there are four pictures: 1) a picture our family, 2) a picture of a sea of Muslims circling the Kaaba, 3) a picture of two bony, famished, Africa kids with hands outstretched, and 4) a picture of the remains of a first trimester baby killed in the womb. The unstated implication is that loving Jesus is, to a large extent, manifest in practical acts of loving “the least of these” His brethren (Matthew 25:31-46) and, in general, obeying His commands (John 14:21).

  Why these issues specifically? Why, if you browse this blog and this site do you see so often the repeated themes of abortion, Christ-centered true-gospel proclaiming missions, and sacrificial financial giving to those who most desperately need it? After a bit of self-examination, I believe that the common theme is that I see the issues of weightiest significance to be those with the most profound life and death implications.

  It seems to me that if we have received the free, undeserved, and sacrificial love of Christ, and thus had our hearts opened to love others likewise, then the horrors of people dying from starvation, and the horrors of helpless babies being killed for their fathers’ (and mothers’) convenience will both move our hearts and move us to action. Arguably even more significant are the billions who are going to their eternal grave without the sole source of hope in the gospel of Jesus Christ ever reaching their societies.

  But there is another issue of life and death overarching these others and uniting them even more deeply. It is the issue of whether the professing church of Christ possesses true vitality or just a dead body surrounded by an external shell of apparent vitality:

I know your deeds; you have a reputation of being alive, but you are dead. Wake up! Strengthen what remains and is about to die, for I have not found your deeds complete in the sight of my God. Remember, therefore, what you have received and heard; obey it, and repent. But if you do not wake up, I will come like a thief, and you will not know at what time I will come to you. (Revelation 3:1-3)

If we harden our hearts in order to feel better about spending more on luxury items for ourselves than on helping starving kids, then as they die the vitality of our spiritual fervor dies right along with them. If we quench the prompting of the Holy Spirit in us to speak and act out against the slaughter of over 3,300 babies per day in America alone, then in the very act of embracing death we take it into ourselves. If we allow ourselves to see the sacrifices necessary for the evangelization of the billions living amongst the unreached nations as too big an inconvenience to our current lifestyle, then by ignoring their death we ignore the means God has given for preserving our own lives (John 12:25).

  If there is one manifestation of death that breaks my heart more than parents killing their babies in the womb, children dying from starvation, and pagans dying without the hope of Christ in the gospel, it is the professing church of Christ killing herself by accounting these other deaths to be too much an inconvenience and hence looking away.

  Sacrificial missions, sacrificial anti-abortion activism, and sacrificial financial giving to those most desperate meld together in my mind as practically one inseparable issue because much more than I long to see the hungry fed, the babies rescued, and the nations reached, I long to see the Bride of Christ alive. It is only a living church that can prayerfully work to accomplish any of these other things. And more importantly, it is only a living church that can worship the Living Lord, much less worship Him passionately, which is the ultimate aim of all things.

Strive To Love More Than Strategize

Wednesday, May 28th, 2008

  The church-growth movement, whether the domestic American version, or the exported, American-based missions version, has a tendency to cheapen beautiful, challenging, life-transforming Scriptural principles into corporate-like methodologies for “success”. A prime example I see of this is when I Cor 9:19-23 is brought down to the level of a mere contextualization strategy. I would propose instead that, in context, this passage at its core is about love, not strategy. Love and strategy at times do indeed overlap. But there is a huge difference between having genuine love at the core of your being versus having a strategic orientation.

  Here is the passage:

For though I am free from all men, I have made myself a slave to all, that I might win the more. And to the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might win Jews; to those who are under the Law, as under the Law, though not being myself under the Law, that I might win those who are under the Law; to those who are without law, as without law, though not being without the law of God but under the law of Christ, that I might win those who are without law. To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak; I have become all things to all men, that I may by all means save some. And I do all things for the sake of the gospel, that I may become a fellow partaker of it.

Out of love Paul makes choices to sacrifice his own freedoms in order to “win” people to Christ. You might hear in that what sounds like a note of “strategy” as well, and if so I don’t completely disagree. But this passage does not cut down into us deeply enough unless we hear the note of love ringing louder than that of strategy.

  Consider, first, the context. Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians is largely a question and answer session, dealing with some issues that the Corinthians raised and some that Paul has raised and wants to remind them of. This letter is more topically structured than possibly any other book of the Bible, and there are several very clear transitions from one topic to the next (”now concerning…”). One way to outline the book as a whole would look like this:

1:1-9 Intro
1:10-4:17 Paul’s Concern 1: Divisions
4:18-6:end Paul’s Concern 2: Sexual Immorality
7:1-7:end Corinthian Question 1: Marriage
8:1-11:1 Corinthian Question 2: Food Sacrificed to Idols
11:2-11:end Praise/rebuke for following/not following the traditions
12:1-14:end Spiritual Gifts
15:1-15:end The gospel
16:1-16:? The collection
Closing

  In particular, note that chapters 8-10 form one section. In verse 8:1 Paul takes up the topic, “Now concerning things sacrificed to idols,” and stays on that topic all the way to his summary comments at the end of chapter 10. Indeed, when Paul speaks in I Cor 10:31 of eating and drinking as activities which must be done for glory of God, he is not merely illustrating a general point by picking mundane daily activities at random to serve as an example. He specifically mentions eating and drinking for the glory of God because that is the specific topic he has been talking about. To supplement that specific case, he adds that of course whatever you do you should do for the glory of God.

  It is not hard to see that food sacrificed to idols is the specific topic behind chapters 8 and 10. But what happens in chapter 9? Ignoring the context, we might conjecture all sorts of ideas for what motivated chapter 9. But when we do look at the context, we see that the flow from chapter 8 to chapter 10 is not at all lost in chapter 9.

  The common thread is love. The Corinthians are asking Paul, “Paul, are Christians allowed to eat food sacrificed to idols or not?” As with the way that Jesus often responds to his questioners, Paul doesn’t answer their question directly because the heart attitude behind the question is wrong. A simple “yes” would give the wrong impression, and a simple “no” would give the wrong impression. Rather than give a simple (and misleading) answer to their question, he wants to retrain their thinking so that they learn to ask better questions.

  Paul’s response begins with this,

[W]e know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge makes arrogant, but love edifies. If anyone supposes that he knows anything, he has not yet known as he ought to know; but if anyone loves God, he is known by Him.

The Corinthians’ question was knowledge-oriented. Paul wanted to turn them to a love focus. He goes on to say that, yes, we know that idols are nothing. Does that mean that Christians can eat food sacrificed to idols? Yes. Does it mean that Christians should eat food sacrificed to idols? Not necessarily. The bigger question is, “Am I behaving lovingly when I eat food sacrificed to idols?” Everything is permissible, but not everything is beneficial.

  Are Christians allowed to eat food sacrificed to idols? Well, yes, all else being equal Christians do have freedom to eat food that was sacrificed to so-called idols. But Christians, unlike Americans, don’t focus on their rights. What I’m “allowed” to do is not my primary concern. The Christian criteria for a good decision is not, “I want it and I have the ability and freedom to get it,” but rather, “This is glorifying to God and loving to my neighbor.” Christians, unlike Americans, gladly sacrifice their rights and give up what they would otherwise be “allowed” to do, because doing something else is more loving to God and man.

  That is Paul’s point in chapters 8 and 10, and he illustrates this point in chapter 9 from his own example. First, Paul expounds the rights and priviledges he could hypothetically claim if he was inclined to:

Am I not free? Am I not an apostle? Have I not seen Jesus our Lord? Are you not the result of my work in the Lord?… Don’t we have the right to food and drink? Don’t we have the right to take a believing wife along with us, as do the other apostles and the Lord’s brothers and Cephas?… If we have sown spiritual seed among you, is it too much if we reap a material harvest from you? If others have this right of support from you, shouldn’t we have it all the more?

If he was not walking in the footsteps of His Lord, Paul theoretically could “lord it over” those entrusted to him, and demand his rights. But he doesn’t. He instead makes a powerful counterstatement that strikes against the core of our selfish beings, and against the core of American culture in particular:

But we did not use this right. On the contrary, we put up with anything rather than hinder the gospel of Christ.

  “But we did not use this right.” Oh how refreshing to hear those words! Yes, I have many rights, but it wouldn’t be beneficial for the kingdom of God for me to exert those rights. So I won’t. Hallelujah, how refreshing to hear!

  Now we reach the passage in question, I Cor 9:19-23, and it is clear that Paul’s heartbeat throughout this letter is love. Paul is tapping into something deeper than what you would find at a cross-cultural business ethics seminar. Yes, take your shoes off at the door, only shake with your right hand, and don’t show the bottom of your foot. Yes, do those things. Be respectable. Even a greedy businesman will show culturally appropriate outward acts of respect so as not to lose business. But he is probably not motivated by love. Likewise, Christians can display certain “social skills” and to outwardly spiritual acts without the motiviation of love. Paul says that such behavior gains us nothing (I Cor 13).

  Consider, now, the application to the modern missions movement. We often hear that much of what happened in the name of (Western) Christians missions in recent centuries came in the form of a colonialism where people were called to conform to Western culture rather than to the image of Christ. True. But here’s the thing. Say that we had a colonialist missionary here in our living room and we had the chance to share with him an exhortation regarding what our generation has learned from I Cor 9:19-23. What would we say?

  The wrong thing to say would be this, “Oh colonialist missionary, don’t you realize that your colonialist approach is not strategic? Your extraction evangelism methodology is removing people from their natural socio-ethno-linguistic networks. Your only chance to trigger a self-propogating church planting movement is if you train people how to follow Jesus while maintaining their culturally-defined religious identities…”.

  No, that would not be helpful. Contextualization as a strategy is not the cure for colonialism. Compassion is. Again, the central problem with colonialism is not that it is unstrategic, but that it is unloving. A better direction for discussion with the colonialist missionary might be to ask whether his demands for the “natives” to take on Western habits is genuinely motivated by love. And if he thinks that imposing Western clothing, music, and architecture is an act of love, then again the central problem is a greatly distorted view of “love” more than anything else.

  Finally, consider Paul’s words, “To the weak I became weak.” Paul didn’t “become weak” by pretending to be weaker than he really was when he was around weak people. Rather, he became weak by loving the weak, not setting himself above them, and by using his strength to bless the weak for their sake rather than to manipulate them for his own sake. And that is the same way he “became” a Jew and “became” a Gentile (one not under the law). The concept of a follower of Christ calling themself a “Muslim” or “Hindu” and acting like a Muslim, Hindu, or pagan was the furthest thing from Paul’s mind in this passage. It doesn’t at all fit the context of this letter, or the context of Paul’s life. Loving the Muslim, Hindu, and pagan by sacrificing one’s own rights and desires in order to build them up in the faith is much more the direction of Paul’s emphasis in the context of I Corinthians and in the example of his entire life and ministry.

  The minute we reduce people to the objects upon whom our methodology is to be implemented we have missed the whole point, whether we do it as a colonialist or as a hyper-contextualist. As we listen to I Corinthians 8-10, and especially 9:19-23, we need to step out of our corporate America strategic-planning mindset, and instead pray that we might absorb a heart of loving self-sacrifice that is ever ready to say, “I have not used any of these rights…. To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law… To those not having the law I became like one not having the law… To the weak I became weak….”