Activism FAQ

  For the last few weeks, on and off, I have hung a banner from my car in the parking lot of my workplace with this image (click for better resolution):


Baby killed at 8 weeks
together with a magnetic car door sign which simply reads, “Men are the Problem, menaretheproblem.info.” To make a long story short, some people complained, the property management got upset and threatened my company that they were in violation of their tenancy agreement unless they made me stop. On Monday October 27, 2008, I was fired.

  Now, it seems that whenever I do something that is considered slightly controversial amongst Christians, like hang a banner displaying the plain reality of abortion from my car or pass our Bibles to Muslims (don’t ask me to explain how the question of whether or not to pass out Bibles can be a controversy in the church !!!???!!!, or how it can even be a question at all !!!???!!!) that there are certain recurring questions and remarks to be addressed. So here is my first edition of an activism FAQ. There is a particular focus on this recent incident with the banner at work, but many of the principles also have wider applicability. Many of these are questions or remarks I’ve heard first hand, some I have heard second hand, and some are questions that I’ve asked myself.1) “Hmm, well Zach. I do appreciate the fact that your heart is open to do something about this issue [whatever it is], but are you sure this is the best way?”  Nope! I’m not sure it is the best way. But I’m pretty sure that it is a good way! Or at the very least an acceptable way! There is a saying out there that, “The good is the greatest enemy of the best,” that is, we never reach the best because we settle for the good. But I’ve found that mixing that adage up is much more relevant to my life, and perhaps yours. My modified saying is, “The best is the greatest enemy of the good.” That is, as long as I keep searching for the best way to do something, I never find it, because every path has its list of disadvantages. Pursuing the best, I end up doing nothing. Better to do the good thing, than to do nothing while on the endless quest to find the best! See also this post.2) “Um, wow. That’s an, um, interesting thing that you did. I’m not sure how to respond.”

  Here is what I think is some Biblical advice for the person in such a situation. You’ve got two choices. If you’ve gathered enough information to adequately understand the situation, and you think that what I’ve done is sinful, then by all means you must rebuke me (Matthew 18:15ff). If not, if what I’ve done appears to be within acceptable parameters for a disciple of Christ, then I think that Biblically you are called to encourage me (1 Thes 5:11) as we continue to spur one another on towards love and good deeds (Hebrews 10:24). Certainly, such encouragement can take the form of constructive suggestion, “Hey, did you think about trying this… ?” But of all of the “one another” statements in the New Testament, I don’t see any that say, “Heap discouragement on one another.” Either rebuke the sin, or encourage the fainthearted (1 Thes 5:14). And yes, I do get fainthearted; I probably loathe conflict more than most people, and yet the Lord keeps putting in me a compelling drive to step out in ways that inevitably bring conflict. It’s hard.  And this isn’t just about me. Let’s all try to stop discouraging each other. One person loves to share Christ in the context of relationships and another loves going door to door. Praise the Lord for both of them, don’t attack each other! One person wants more prayer meetings and another one wants more Bible study. They are both right! Any desire within the church to turn off the tube and devote oneself to holy endeavors of eternal value should be cultivated rather than squelched. To anyone I have discouraged in their simple quest to love and please the Lord, I’m sorry; I’m seeking to turn away from that and be an encourager of all things good.

3) “What’s all this focus on abortion? Have you abandoned your passion for missions?”

  I still think the greatest need, and what I would like to do more than anything, is the public preaching of the gospel in so-called closed countries. Please pray that God would fill me with His Spirit to empower me for that ministry. I tried standing up on street corners and speaking out a few times in China. Words of conviction and power just don’t seem to come to my lips when I try public speaking. I must say that I just don’t feel the Holy Spirit is in it. Now, when I give a talk on an issue that I’ve written five papers about and spent ten years thinking about, I can by God’s grace give a good empassioned talk. I hope and pray that through writing the Lord will solidify things in my heart and mind which I can then speak about more effectively.

  But I digress. Abortion? Ya, it is quite important too. In fact, I can’t begin to tell you the numerous ways I see the issues as utterly interrelated. Well yes, I can at least begin to do it. See this post and this one. Consider also the non-compartmentalization of God. It seems to me in the Old Testament that if a Hebrew cheated with unbalanced weights and measures in the marketplace (see Deut 25:13-16), then as an “abomination” in the eyes of the Lord, he would have no reason to expect victory out on the battlefield (compare Joshua 7). If I harden my heart to a wicked and unjust atrocity of such magnificent proportions in my own country (and elsewhere) as abortion, how can I go make disciples of all nations, teaching them to obey all that Jesus has commanded us? Again, the Great Commission isn’t to rake in millions of prayer cards signed by professed converts who don’t really even know Him, it is to make disciples.

4) “Have you thought about your family and especially your kids?”

  Ya, I’ve thought a lot about my family. I’ve thought about my family through the perspective of the German kids who were raised by parents who didn’t really support the Holocaust, but who thought that standing up against the actions of the Nazi regime would be too costly. I’ve thought about my family through the perspective of those kids, now grown, whom I’ve heard say, “I can’t believe my parents stood by and let that happen.”

  As a father I have a responsibility to protect my kids. And some dangers are greater than others. I might let my son fall out of his chair and get a small bump if he insists on ignoring my instruction to sit down on his bum. But I won’t let him “learn the hard way” with a chainsaw. The greatest danger facing all of humanity is eternal hellfire for rejecting God and the salvation offered through His Son Jesus Christ. Unrepentant cowardice is one way that we demonstrate that we have never come to know Jesus or had our name written in His book of life (Rev 21:8), because those who do come to Him receive a Spirit not of timidity but of power (2 Tim 1:7). My greatest responsibility then, to the two little boys who imitate just about anything I do and say is to model for them godliness and faith, rather than fear of man and unbelief.

  When my friend Rick and I were facing the threat of a 2-5 year jail sentence for proselytization in Malaysia, our main interrogator Sergeant Ibrahim repeatedly said to Rick things like, “You are a bad father. You did this and got yourself in trouble while you have a little daughter at home.” In speaking this way, Sergeant Ibrahim was the very mouthpiece of Satan for discouragement to Rick. Little Esther (and now Sarah as well) are very blessed to have a father who loves Jesus as much as Rick does. The best love and care and protection he can give them is to show them how to live for Jesus. Second to my own dad who loves me dearly and was instrumental in leading me to Christ following his own conversion, second to him Rick is (at least tied for) the father I respect the most.

5) “But what about providing stability for your wife?”

  Let me tell you about a woman I know, let’s call her Lisa. Lisa is a preacher’s wife. Lisa’s husband has preached solid Biblical truth from the pulpit for many years. He has emphasized that our thinking must be shaped by the Bible. He has repeatedly said he wants his church to “not merely be a church with Bibles, but rather a Biblical church.” Then one day someone comes along and says, “Hey, here are 1000 free copies of the gospel of Luke in the language of the local Muslim people of this area. Let’s distribute them to people in this church to give to their Muslim friends.”

  Seems like a no-brainer, right? But for a church in this area to be known as actively evangelizing Muslims would bring some consequences. People could lose jobs, the government could take away the expensive church property, and Lisa and her husband who are actually citizens of a different country could be deported. In the end, Lisa’s husband goes along with the decision of his elder board not only to refrain from distributing these Bibles but actually to prohibit the distribution of Bibles in the Muslim language on church grounds. Lisa’s husband has flipped from wanting to shepherd a congregation that seeks “not merely be a church with Bibles, but rather a Biblical church,” into leading a church that outlaws Bibles because the consequences of having them around are deemed too costly. Lisa and her husband get to keep their house and keep their jobs, simply by throwing away everything that her husband has claimed to stand for for decades.

  I feel sad for Lisa. I don’t want to do that to my wife. I want to provide her the stability of knowing that through loss of job, loss of freedom, loss of house, loss of money, loss of property, and loss of life, not only will I never leave her nor forsake her, but I will also always strive to uncompromisingly keep our family on the one solid and stable rock that can endure any tsunami (Matthew 7:24-27).

6) “What crazy thing are you going to do next?”

  I’ve found that the Lord doesn’t open my eyes to step 2 until I’ve taken step 1. So I try to be faithful in the little things, and hope that He will entrust me with greater things. See also the answer to question 1 above. Whatever it is, may it not be “crazy” except in the sense of being “crazy for Jesus, His kingdom, and His righteousness.”

7) “If you end up in jail in some country for doing whatever it is, how do you want people to pray for you?”

  Pray through Philippians 1.

8) “How would you encourage others to act in light of the overwhelming atrocity of ongoing slaughter in this country?”

  If you have an idea of your own, that fits the way God has made you and is within Biblical parameters, then by all means I want to encourage you to do that which is on your heart.

  Ultimately I think the only hope and only answer to the abortion problem is prayer (Luke 18:1-8). But note, the cited parable doesn’t speak of the Lord being moved by a half-hearted word of prayer. Rather it says that He will not delay to bring about justice to His elect who cry out to Him day and night. I believe that a movement of empassioned prayer will only happen in tandem with a movement of empassioned living. If the Spirit prompts us with ideas of, “Hey I could hang a banner from my car,” or whatever, and if we quench Him, then we will be quenching the Spirit of prayer. See again this post.

  If you really feel you “should do something” about this issue, and really don’t know what, I’d be glad to talk you through it. I do have some ideas myself, but even better if in talking I could help draw out some ideas that suit how God has made you.

9) “What drives your concern about abortion? Are you concerned more about the babies, or the mothers, or your own reputation, or what?”

  There is concern for the babies. If you haven’t already, definitely watch The Silent Scream in which an ultrasound recorded the actual images inside the womb as an abortion was happening. This movie is in some ways even more moving than the graphic movies of baby hands and feet being removed from the uterus after he has already been dismembered, because in the Silent Scream you actually see the terrified baby in the supposed safe, warm haven of his mother’s womb, sensing that he is in trouble as the baby vacuum starts poking around. You can almost hear him screaming, “Help me, help me, I’m in trouble, momma, dadda, can you help me? I’m scared!” But of course momma and dadda don’t come to help because they are the ones who paid to have him torn to pieces. So even though the baby is in some ways blessed to be spared from having to live a long life in this evil fallen world (Isa 57:1-2), you still have to have compassion for such a defenseless one to face such a traumatic experience.

  There is pastoral concern for the mothers, too. Hopefully they will find repentance, restoration, forgiveness, and spiritual and even physical healing. Even still, the saddness of such a terrible choice will be hard to break free from in this life.

  And I have a particular concern for the party that is all too neglected in discussions about abortion — the fathers. It is one of the most pathetic and disgusting things imaginable to see true manhood disappearing in a landscape of immature boys who care more about “getting laid” (and football) than things like honor, valor, and responsibility. Seeing selfish boys of any age turn in to real men is always a refreshing and inspiring experience.

  But more so than any of these I’d say my concern is for Christians. If I hang such a banner from my car, I’m more hoping to move the hearts of pro-lifers than pro-choicers. What? Yep. Really, what I want more than anything else is to remove any barriers to a passionate relationship between Christ and His church. And the ongoing hardening of our hearts is just such a major barrier. See again this post.

10) “Why did you sign the end of your prayer letter with `Zach, on behalf of my wonderfully supportive wife, and our two martyr-for-Jesus-in-training sons’?”

  Well, I’m Zach, my wife really has been wonderfully supportive during this and the one or two other “controversial” deeds of activism I have engaged in since we’ve been married, and oh, the bit about our sons being in training for martyrdom for Jesus? I can’t say I have a well formulated curriculum at this point, but basically that is just another way of saying I want them to be Christians. Because I’m sure you realize that Bonhoeffer was Biblically spot on when he said, “When Christ calls a man, he calls him to come and die.” Martyrs-for-Jesus-in-training are the only kind of Christians I see in the Bible.

11) “Perhaps you are being rebellious against authority [the government, or the employer as the case may be].”

  That certainly is a valid issue. The extent to which God expects us to submit to human authority structures even when those people are sinful, wicked, unbelieving, Christian persecuting pagans, is astounding. David knew that Saul had departed from the way of the Lord, but refused to lift a finger to harm the king whom he called “the Lord’s Anointed.” David even killed the messenger who came to tell him of Saul’s demise. All this despite the fact that Saul had spent years on a rabid mission to destroy David (1 and 2 Samuel). Slaves are taught to obey masters who mercilessly beat them (1 Peter 2), and wives are taught to submit to unbelieving husbands “in the same way” (1 Peter 3). Christians of all stripes are commanded to submit to the very governments that persecute them (1 Peter 1, Romans 13). Remarkable.

  Ultimately the reason, I believe, is that human authority is a shadow of the One True Authority over all heaven and earth. Just as Saul, having been anointed as king, was a shadow of the Anointed One (i.e. the Messiah = Christ). As much as a king, or a husband, or a master, or a parent might fail to live a life of godliness, they still hold the “office” which is a shadow of the true King, Husband, Master, and Father of all.

  But at the same time, we are clearly taught to obey God rather than men (Acts 4) and to fear God rather than men (Matthew 10:17-28). We are also called to have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather to expose them (Eph 5:11). When Esther dared to approach King Xerxes she said, “If [I and my people] had merely been sold as male and female slaves, I would have kept quiet, because no such distress would justify disturbing the king [emphasis added]” (Esther 7:4b). Causing annoyance to the king, or the president, or the master, or the boss, or the husband, or the parent, or the church elder whose authority you are under is no small thing at all. And yet, when people are in fact being given over to slaughter, destruction, and annihilation (Esther 7:4a) it is not only commensurate but in fact incumbent upon the people of God to somehow intervene (Prov 24:11-12).

  When it comes to these sorts of things, there is nothing that I struggle with more than seeking to know how to respect and be submissive towards authority while at the same time realizing that to completely satisfy the authority would require exalting their wishes and desires about God’s priorities. I agonize for days and weeks and months over such things. I would be delighted to receive a clear and unmistakable prophetic word from the Lord saying, “Do this, don’t do that.” But until that comes, I’m accountable to make the best decisions I can in light of His revealed word with dependence on His Spirit through prayer.

  Do I come out with exactly the right balance on these issues? Probably not. Before this most recent banner at work experience there was something else I had tried, and after a conversation with my boss one time I had to go back to him and apologize for not speaking respectfully. He said he didn’t think I was disrespectful but I knew that by the standard I’d seen in Scripture I was. Of course, I later went on to do some things he didn’t like. But I sought harder to be respectful in the process. So I make mistakes, repent, persevere, keep learning, and move ahead.

  So yes, perhaps I have been rebellious against authority in this or that situation, and to the extent that it is so may the Lord bring correction. But before jumping to such conclusions or lightly throwing around such accusations, please realize that there are agonizingly difficult issues in the balance here.

12) “Why do this at the workplace? It’s not like you work for a company that makes baby vacuums or anything like that. If you are going to protest, why not do it outside of Planned Parenthood?”

  First of all, it is not either/or. Protesting outside of an abortion clinic is certainly commendable and I have done so in the past.

  But I was specifically compelled to take action at the workplace primarily because, after my home, that is where I was spending the most of my time each week. I believe that with proximity (be it geographical, relational, etc.) comes responsibility. Let’s talk about evangelism for a minute. It is good and commendable if you wish to share a brief word about Christ to the cashier at the checkout counter or the person riding in the elevator with you. I almost never do that, unless they happen to say something that gives me opportunity to simply speak my thoughts about the Lord. But as for somebody you spend gobs of time with, isn’t it all the more reasonable that they should know what you believe? [And yes I have spoken about Christ with people in the workplace, especially how He is foreshadowed in the Old Testament (a subject I’m particulary interested in), more than I have spoken with workmates about abortion.] So the more time you spend with people, the more it tears you up inside if you haven’t talked with them about the matters you know to be most important.

  Also, bringing the issue of abortion into the “average everyday workplace” is precisely my intended target. One of the big reasons atrocities such as the slaughter of American lives on the order of a 9/11 tragedy every single are allowed to continue, is because we who know the truth allow society to define the categories and parameters in which the “issue” is addressed. We allow society to stick it with the label “political and/or religious issue” and then we go along with the reasoning that the workplace is not the appropriate context for dialogue on religious and political issue. Ladies and gentlemen, this is more than a religious or political issue. Although I certainly support Colorado’s “Personhood Amendment” 48, I find it offensive that alongside being asked whether I want to reduce tax subsidies to energy companies, I am also asked to register my “personal opinion” on whether a small defenseless person should be acknowledged as a person or whether we should be allowed to chop him up into pieces and suck the pieces out with a vacuum. This is more than a “ballot issue.”

  When there is a national tragedy, even “business workplaces” show enough respect to lower the flag to half mast. Flags should be lowered for respect, rememberance, and shame over the fallen every single day in this country, and short of that happening, I believe that making my own show (in the workplace parking lot) of respect for the dead is entirely appropriate, and if anything it is probably far too little.

13) “OK, but if you want to speak out in the workplace, why a banner on your car?”

  Why not?

  Actually, I did try a few other things before I had the banner idea. I did talk about the issue with the coworkers I knew best [of course, not charging such time to my record of working hours]. The boss said that if the issue came up, it was OK to discuss, but if I tried going from person to person or office to office with such an agenda that I would be canned. I passed out fliers in front of the workplace for about 10 minutes before property management came down on me. I talked with the boss about having an informal, off hours, voluntary forum in which to invite fellow coworkers, and he was actually OK with the idea, but the rest of the management team nixed the idea. The lines kept getting pushed back further and further. Eventually I came up with the idea of a banner on my car, figuring that what I did with my own car in the parking lot outside of the workplace was my own business. And again, to his credit, the boss was personally agreeable, but property management wasn’t.

  I could have stuck with a bumper sticker on my car, and probably wouldn’t have had any trouble. It also would have had virtually no impact. Unfortunately, on such matters, there seems to be a high correlation between people not getting upset and people not paying the least bit of attention to what you are doing.

14) “Are you going to sue your company for violating your rights to free speech?”

  No. Certainly there is a place for “claiming one’s Roman citizenship” not merely for the sake of defending one’s self from receiving a flogging but also: 1) to bring attention (light) to a matter that the forces of the world would want to sweep under the rug and hide and forget about, and 2) to set a precedent. I can see the legitimacy of at least considering the possibility that the case with my current employer is such a case that should fought in court with a godly demeanor. However, my conclusion is that this is not such a case. My main two reasons are:
  i) My bosses are Christian. Along the lines of 1 Cor 6, I think it would bring shame on the name of Christ to bring this issue before the pagan courts and news media. I can hear them now, “Look, the Christians can’t even agree amongst themselves about this issue, so why should we listen to anything they say?”
  ii) Even if I did have a right under American law to not be discriminated against in this way, it is not a right I want to claim or press for. Personally, I believe my employer should be able to fire me if they don’t like the effect my views have on the workplace environment. Morally, I think my employer is wrong. But I don’t think that “doing the right thing” is something that should be legislated in this type of case.

  If the boss wanted to stand up to property management in court and say, “Hey, you can’t threaten us that we are in violation of tenancy agreement for refusing to fire Zach over this,” then I think I would support the company in doing so. But they don’t want to. They would rather get rid of me and the legal counseling fees I was costing them. So if that is the way the company wants to go, I don’t want to fight from that angle in court.

15) “Are you seeking to get persecuted?”

  Are you crazy? No way! If you think I enjoy conflict then you definitely don’t know me. Or is it that you think that I love to get praised by fellow Christians for being zealous? Well yes, I do, and I repent of that. But I need to make you aware of a very sad reality that my experience has been whenever you seek to serve the Lord in a way that may bring about some suffering that could have been avoided had you compromised and watered down your stance, then in choosing the path of righteousness that involves a bit of suffering you will face more discouragement from professed Christians than encouragement. Other professed Christians get afraid that you are going to “make trouble” for them too. Perhaps that is why some portions of this post may come across as defensive or even bitter. I’m sorry for that. I don’t want to give any room to bitterness.

  I don’t seek persecution. But I don’t make the avoidance of it a high priority either. Here is the key: neither seeking persecution nor seeking to avoid persecution should be our decision criteria. The decision criteria is, “How can I please the Lord? What decision is in line with godliness and holiness as revealed in Scripture?”

  You can tell what a listener values by what they focus in on. Supposedly (I haven’t found verification of this story) one time Tony Campolo, speaking to a church audience, said, “Four million (or some such number) people died from starvation last year and nobody gives a shit about it. And the proof of that is that you are more worked up that the guy in the pulpit just said a naughty word than you are about the four million dead from starvation.”

  Suppose I say, “Tom preached the gospel to 100 Muslims and they beat him and threw him in jail (or killed him or whatever).” One person will say, “What? Tom did something that got himself beaten!? How foolish!” Another will say, “Wow, 100 Muslims got to hear the gospel at once! Praise the Lord!” Be careful how you listen, because in doing so you reveal what you consider to be of great account and what you consider to be of small account.

  To those who say that I’m seeking persecution, I say you are missing the point. You are focusing in on the wrong part of the story.

16) “You are not even being `persecuted’, you are just facing the consequences of a bad decision. Christians should be willing to suffer for Jesus, but not for doing something stupid.”

  I don’t think that I ever said I was being persecuted. The word comes up when we discuss such issues, but I don’t think I would choose to use it to describe this situation. I would say though that I believe this incident falls under the category of suffering for righteousness sake. If you think that displaying my banner [or say, passing out Bibles to Muslims] is “stupid”, well I guess you are entitled to your opinion. But I think it is a pretty sad opinion to have. Could you explain to me why you would call such things “stupid”?

  The Biblical call to be ready to suffer in this world alongside Jesus is more than merely passive. Yes, if someone of their own initiative comes to you and points a gun to your head and tells you to renounce Christ then you should stand firm in the faith. But love demands more than that. Let’s say that you were a white Southerner a few decades ago when hate-filled white folk were lynching blacks in America. Let’s further say that no one comes around demanding to know where you stand on the “lynching debate” with threats to harm you if they discover you are a “nigger-lover.” The only way you will suffer is if you take the initiative upon yourself to step out and do something. At the same time, the only way you can LOVE the black community is if you take the initiative upon yourself to step out and do something.

  Note that we didn’t go up to heaven to bring Jesus down and crucify Him. He came. We didn’t even want Him to come, but He came. LOVE often demands that we put ourself in the line of fire to rescue others. The fact that such a concept would be so foreign to contemporary evangelical Christianity is a testimony to how far we have wandered from the core of the true Biblical gospel itself.

2 Responses to “Activism FAQ”

  1. Kemi Says:

    hi zach,
    great writing! you are so right on. press on brother!
    and the section about the wives…it drives me nuts that people think that us wives need this comfy place. that we can not also play a part in bringing the light of the kingdom of God to this earth. it would be great to have angie (if she wanted) to write a little piece in that section.
    hey, a long time ago when you were in china, you guys asked if anyone would be willing to adopt a child so they would not be aborted. i remember when i read that i said, `no way, i´m not adopting` but since then God has really put on my heart to love those kiddos. so…if you ever come across somebody that needs a mommy and a daddy, please think of us. no matter what country/race it is. or even if we had to take the pregnant mom into our home so that she would carry out the pregnancy. whichever, call us.
    we´ll be praying for you guys!
    keep up the fight!
    kemi

  2. Robbie McNerney Says:

    Dear Zach,

    Well done on your brave stand for the truth of God. I read your
    blog entry concerning the events leading up to your job termination, and was
    greatly encouraged by your faith. You have acted according to your
    conscience before God and it has led to suffering for the sake of
    righteousness. So I wanted to write and offer my two cents of
    encouragement. Two cents, but a whole-hearted two cents, I assure you.

    I got the sense from your blog entry that their may be some discouraging or
    at least squeamish, luke-warmish questioning coming your way, either
    spoken or implied. So I’m writing to you in Jesus’ name to give you a
    hearty pat on the back, and say well done.

    You may not see it now, but I fully believe that God can use your own
    experience of trial in this matter to spur on other brothers and
    sisters to greater boldness and fearlessness in proclaiming the truth
    in Jesus and acting according to it in all areas of life. I think of
    Paul’s words of encouragement to the Philippians:

    12 Now I want you to know, brethren, that my circumstances have
    turned out for the greater progress of the gospel,
    13 so that my imprisonment in the cause of Christ has become well
    known throughout the whole praetorian guard and to everyone else,
    14 and that most of the brethren, trusting in the Lord because of my
    imprisonment, have far more courage to speak the word of God without
    fear. Phil 1:12-14 (NASB).

    That is God’s truth. That is how God works.

    Also, besides congratulating you on your courageous act, I wanted to
    remind you to rejoice - go ahead, leap for joy! Look to the reward.

    22 “Blessed are you when men hate you, and ostracize you, and insult
    you, and scorn your name as evil, for the sake of the Son of Man.
    23 “Be glad in that day and leap for joy, for behold, your reward is
    great in heaven. For in the same way their fathers used to treat the
    prophets.” Luke 6:22-23 (NASB).

    Recently I was meditating on parts of John 12, in particular the
    account of Mary’s choice to anoint Jesus with her costly perfume, and
    her being criticized for it by men, but praised by Jesus. It would
    seem that Mary did this as a “free will” type of offering in love -
    indeed, if she was obeying some command or suggestion on the part of
    Jesus, I don’t think the others would have criticized her (in Mark
    14:4-5 we read that not only Judas but some others also scolded her as
    well - it wasn’t just the thief who took offense at her act of love).

    I was thinking on this passage as it relates to other types of willing, costly
    sacrifices which some may similarly choose to make for Jesus’ sake today, either
    in proclaiming His gospel in particularly risky ways or places, or
    doing other godly but risky things for His sake. However, in distinction from Mary’s act, I’m now
    thinking of those costly acts of faith which proceed out of some clear command found in the counsel of Scripture.

    Both the act of proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ and your persevering efforts in exposing the evil of abortion belong to this category. On the other hand, Mary’s act of devotion appears to be offered without reference to a particular commandment given by God, and indeed her use of the expensive perfume to perform something for Jesus which He had not asked her to do is what leaves room for the reproach which Mary endures from the crowd. The point is this – if Jesus rebuked Mary’s critics and praised her costly act of devotion to Him in the anointing with perfume, something which He had NOT specifically commanded His disciples to provide in their service to Him, HOW MUCH MORE should we expect that He will praise and reward and honor those who perform similarly costly acts of heartfelt devotion which ARE born out of a desire to obey His own specific commands?

    21 “He who has My commandments and keeps them is the one who loves Me; and he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him and will disclose Myself to him.” John 14:21.

    Or put another way,

    22 Samuel said, “Has the LORD as much delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, And to heed than the fat of rams. 1 Sam 15:22.

    Indeed, I think your brave act of trumpeting the evil of abortion before a scornful world belongs to this second, even more praise-worthy category of obedience to God’s commands. I mean, I can think of LOTS of SCRIPTURE TEXTS which might compel someone to act as you did. Moreover, your act of devotion to Christ was costly only because of the wicked world we live in, NOT because you acted foolishly or extravagantly in your love for Him and desire to obey your Master.

    In this upside-down, rebellious world, many inevitably will criticize those who honor Christ with the devotion and obedience which His deity commands. However John 12 shows me that when
    some good (and perhaps costly) thing is done for Jesus’ sake, even in the absence of a direct command, I ought to leave it to the Master to praise or critique - I dare not tread on such holy
    ground:

    4 Who are you to judge the servant of another? To his own master he
    stands or falls; and he will stand, for the Lord is able to make him
    stand.
    5 One person regards one day above another, another regards every day
    alike. Each person must be fully convinced in his own mind.
    6 He who observes the day, observes it for the Lord, and he who eats,
    does so for the Lord, for he gives thanks to God; and he who eats not,
    for the Lord he does not eat, and gives thanks to God.
    7 For not one of us lives for himself, and not one dies for himself;
    8 for if we live, we live for the Lord, or if we die, we die for the
    Lord; therefore whether we live or die, we are the Lord’s.
    9 For to this end Christ died and lived again, that He might be Lord
    both of the dead and of the living.
    10 But you, why do you judge your brother? Or you again, why do you
    regard your brother with contempt? For we will all stand before the
    judgment seat of God.
    11 For it is written, “AS I LIVE, SAYS THE LORD, EVERY KNEE SHALL BOW
    TO ME, AND EVERY TONGUE SHALL GIVE PRAISE TO GOD.”
    12 So then each one of us will give an account of himself to God. Rom 14:4-12 (NASB).

    To his own master he stands or falls - and if it is a mere question of
    worthiness - well Jesus our Master and His gospel is worthy of all we
    could ever “lose” as we seek to obey Him in this life – temporary losses now which are in truth eternal gain for us with Him in the age to come:

    17 For momentary, light affliction is producing for us an eternal weight of glory far beyond all comparison,
    18 while we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen; for the things which are seen are temporal, but the things which are not seen are eternal. 2 Cor 4:17-18.

    One important note: the reasoning followed here is not at all meant to even hint at excusing dis-obedience in the name of “worship” to God’s and His all-surpassing worthiness:

    3 And He answered and said to them, “Why do you yourselves transgress the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition?
    4 “For God said, ‘HONOR YOUR FATHER AND MOTHER,’ and, ‘HE WHO SPEAKS EVIL OF FATHER OR MOTHER IS TO BE PUT TO DEATH.’
    5 “But you say, ‘Whoever says to his father or mother, “Whatever I have that would help you has been given to God,”
    6 he is not to honor his father or his mother.’ And by this you invalidated the word of God for the sake of your tradition.
    7 “You hypocrites, rightly did Isaiah prophesy of you:
    8 ‘THIS PEOPLE HONORS ME WITH THEIR LIPS, BUT THEIR HEART IS FAR AWAY FROM ME.
    9 ‘BUT IN VAIN DO THEY WORSHIP ME, TEACHING AS DOCTRINES THE PRECEPTS OF MEN.’” Matthew 15:3-9.

    “You hypocrites,” is what Jesus calls such false worshipers. Indeed, according to this passage, what is God’s evaluation of those who try to shirk obedience to His clear command in Scripture to honor one’s father and mother, merely by invoking some sort of personally crafted, false piety (See also 1 Sam 15:22 above in this regard)? God’s conclusion: “IN VAIN DO THEY WORSHIP ME”.

    The point of bringing up the above passage is to address one potential objection to costly expenditure in the cause of Christ, namely the accusation that our worship is in vain because we neglect the true commandments of God in order to carry out our own costly acts of “devotion”. Let us now see why such an objection cannot be applied to your case. For example, some might (wrongly) criticize this way: Because you did this, now you don’t have an income to provide for your family – is that really honoring to God? This is faulty criticism; you are not responsible for the punishment an evil world inflicts on you or others as a result of your obedience. No, we are responsible for our obedience or want thereof to God’s commands – we dare not “calculate” whether an act of obedience is pleasing to God based upon whether or not the world can tolerate our obedience or not!

    You have suffered for righteousness’ sake. In the course of obeying Jesus, you paid a price of suffering imposed as punishment by an evil world. As to the REWARD for your obedience, well your Master and mine will see adequately to that! And when your reward appears, your momentary, light affliction here on earth will seem as nothing in comparison to the joy you have gained:

    12 Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery ordeal among you, which comes upon you for your testing, as though some strange thing were happening to you;
    13 but to the degree that you share the sufferings of Christ, keep on rejoicing, so that also at the revelation of His glory you may rejoice with exultation. 1 Pet 4:12-13.

    On the far opposite end of the extreme, the folks whom Jesus is condemning (in the above Matthew 15 passage) feign “righteousness” in order to avoid the “suffering” associated with true righteousness, in particular in the honoring and helping of one’s parents materially. They didn’t want to pay the price of true obedience, so they hid their disobedience behind a guise of super-holiness. God is not fooled.

    At the same time, we have no right to boast in the cost which we may have to pay in order to obey our Master:

    10 “So you too, when you do all the things which are commanded you, say, ‘We are unworthy slaves; we have done only that which we ought to have done.’” Luke 17:10.

    Finally, I thought you might be encouraged by some of Matthew Henry’s commentary on the John 12 passage where Mary anoints Jesus. As I
    read some of Henry’s points of analysis, I thought of some of your own
    comments and analysis in this “Activism FAQ” blog entry. Be encouraged
    brother!

    Excerpts below from Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary on John 12. (Public domain text. No rights reserved. May be distributed freely):

    [I. Mary’s act of love towards Christ]

    “The particular respect which Mary showed him, above
    the rest, in anointing his feet with sweet ointment…

    “…Doubtless she intended this as a token of her love to Christ, who had given real
    tokens of his love to her and her family; and thus she studies what
    she shall render (emphasis added). Now by this her love to Christ appears to have been,

    (1.) A generous love; so far from sparing necessary charges in his
    service, she is as ingenious to create an occasion of expense in
    religion as most are to avoid it. If she had any thing more valuable
    than another, that must be brought out for the honour of Christ. Note,
    Those who love Christ truly love him so much better than this world as
    to be willing to lay out the best they have for him.

    (2.) A condescending love; she not only bestowed her ointment upon Christ,
    but with her own hands poured it upon him, which she might have
    ordered one of her servants to have done; nay, she did not, as usual,
    anoint his head with it, but his feet. True love, as it does not spare
    charges, so it does not spare pains, in honouring Christ. Considering
    what Christ has done and suffered for us, we are very ungrateful if we
    think any service too hard to do, or too mean to stoop to, whereby he
    may really be glorified.

    (3.) A believing love; there was faith working by this love, faith in Jesus as the Messiah, the Christ, the
    Anointed, who, being both priest and king, was anointed as Aaron and
    David were. Note, God’s Anointed should be our Anointed. Has God
    poured on him the oil of gladness above his fellows? Let us pour on
    him the ointment of our best affections above all competitors… (emphasis added)

    “…Honours done to Christ are comforts to all his friends and followers; they are
    to God and good men an offering of a sweet-smelling savour… (emphasis added)

    [II. Judas’s contempt for Mary’s act of love towards Christ]

    “…Judas’s dislike of Mary’s compliment, or token of her respect to
    Christ, v. 4, 5, where observe, 1. The person that carped at it was
    Judas, one of his disciples; not one of their nature, but only one of
    their number. It is possible for the worst of men to lurk under the
    disguise of the best profession; and there are many who pretend to
    stand in relation to Christ who really have no kindness for him. Judas
    was an apostle, a preacher of the gospel, and yet one that discouraged
    and checked this instance of pious affection and devotion. Note, It is sad to see the life of religion and holy zeal frowned upon and discountenanced by such as are bound by their office to assist and
    encourage it… (emphasis added)

    “…But this was he that should betray Christ. Note, Coldness of love to Christ, and a secret contempt of serious piety, when they appear in professors of religion, are sad presages of a
    final apostasy (emphasis added). Hypocrites, by less instances of worldliness, discover
    themselves to be ready for a compliance with greater temptations… (emphasis added)

    “2. The pretence with which he covered his dislike (v. 5): “Why was not
    this ointment, since it was designed for a pious use, sold for three
    hundred pence”… “and given to the poor?”…

    “…Here is worldly wisdom passing a censure upon pious zeal, as guilty of
    imprudence and mismanagement. Those who value themselves upon their
    secular policy, and undervalue others for their serious piety, have
    more in them of the spirit of Judas than they would be thought to
    have (emphasis added)…

    “…Judas asked, Why was it not given to the poor?
    To which it is easy to answer, Because it was better bestowed upon the
    Lord Jesus. Note, We must not conclude that those do no acceptable
    piece of service who do not do it in our way, and just as we would
    have them; as if every thing must be adjudged imprudent and unfit
    which does not take its measures from us and our sentiments. Proud men
    think all ill-advised who do not advise with them… (emphasis added)

    [III. Christ’s approval and defense of Mary’s act of love towards Him]

    “…V. Christ’s justification of what Mary did (v. 7, 8): Let her alone.
    Hereby he intimated his acceptance of her kindness (though he was
    perfectly mortified to all the delights of sense, yet, as it was a
    token of her goodwill, he signified himself well-pleased with it), and
    his care that she should not be molested in it: Pardon her, so it may
    be read; “excuse her this once, if it be an error it is an error of
    her love.” Note, Christ would not have those censured nor discouraged
    who sincerely design to please him, though in their honest endeavours
    there be not all the discretion that may be, Rom. 14:3. Though we
    would not do as they do, yet let them alone” (emphasis added).

    End of excerpts from Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary on John 12.

    Much love in Christ,

    Robbie McNerney

Leave a Reply